|
Activist Starts
"Home Rule for Dixie" Web Site:
If
it can play in Ireland, Scotland and Wales, it can play in Dixie, too, says
long-time Southern activist Jim Langcuster.
Langcuster, inspired by a close
study of home-rule movements in the British Isles, has established a new web
site advocating a similar approach for Dixie.
Langcuster, who is a founding
member of the League of the South, one of the three original founders of the
Southern party, and the author of the Asheville Declaration, believes the
current approach to Southern self-determination, which advocates secession and
full-blown independence for Dixie, simply isn't practical at the present time.
Instead, he believes contemporary Southerners should take their cue from
home-rule movements in Ireland, Scotland and Wales.
"What we've managed to do
throughout the South within the past few years through organizations such as the
Southern Party is appeal to a subculture -- people who have an affinity for the
Old Confederacy and who feel strongly about defending Confederate symbols from
assaults by groups such as the NAACP," says Langcuster. "However,
we've failed to reach the hundreds of thousands of what I call
'non-traditionalist conservative Southerners' who live in the suburbs and for
whom appeals to Confederate symbols and the legacy of the Old Confederacy simply
don't make much of an impression."
"Among many of these people,
appeals to secession either fall on deaf ears or cause outright alarm in some
quarters," he says.
The solution, he believes, is
crafting a strategy and a message to reach people within the political, social
and cultural context in which they're accustomed.
"To build a movement, we
must set parameters within which most rank-and-file Southerners feel
comfortable," Langcuster says. "Part of this will involve revising and
updating Southern nationalism in order to become more relevant to changing
times."
As Langcuster sees it, part of
this updating will involve reaching the growing numbers of disenfranchised
conservatives who are "culturally seceding" from the predominant
secular culture and building alternative cultural institutions, such as
businesses and schools. As he sees it, these groups constitute a natural base
for a fresh, new self-determinationist message.
"What many of these
disenfranchised conservatives don't understand is that the predominant culture
likely will not continue turning a blind eye to their emerging
counter-culture," Langcuster says. "In fact, the left's increasingly
hostile remarks about home schooling are a good indication that the enmity
toward home schools and other alternative cultural institutions will intensify
in coming years."
The ideal solution for
safeguarding this alternative culture, Langcuster says, would be separate
nationhood replete with secure borders and all of the other amenities associated
with sovereignty. However, since such a course is impossible for the foreseeable
future, the next available alternative should be focusing these counter-cultural
efforts within the region where they are most likely to be insulated from these
threats: the South.
"The fact remains that the
South, more than any other region of the country, remains the most congenial to
the formation of a widespread counter-cultural movement," Langcuster says.
"It has a long history of resistance to central authority dating back to
the tariff crisis of the 1830s, a somewhat embattled, but enduring, faith in the
merits of limited, constitutional government, and a people, black and white
alike, who, by and large, still remain faithful to traditional notions of public
morality."
If cultural secession requires a
safe haven in order to succeed and if the South appears to be the region best
equipped to serve this role, Langcuster believes the obvious next step should be
building a broad-based, grassroots movement advocating the fullest measure of
autonomy for the region.
As he sees it, home rule, as a
political strategy for securing this autonomy, would be somewhere between state
sovereignty and secession.
"Given the increasing
interest and even outright clamor for decentralization not only in the United
States but worldwide, I can envision a day fast approaching when Southern
nationalists and disenfranchised conservatives join hands in order to form a
regional movement for the South," Langcuster says.
"If such a movement gathered
sufficient popular force, it eventually could form the foundation for a
broad-based grassroots coalition -- a kind of unofficial regional congress --
that could meet annually or even bi-annually in order to pass resolutions, issue
policy statements and papers, and act as a moral force on behalf of the
region."
For more information about home
rule for Dixie, visit Langcuster's web site at http://www.homerule-for-dixie.com
|