The Southern Independence Party of Texas

ISRAELI TROOPS UNLEASH THIRD NAZI STYLE INVASION

Federation of States, Written April 26, 2001, but not published until September 25, 2002. - In stark defiance of the United Nations resolution for Israel to halt their invasion and make a rapid military pull out of Palestine and in an arrogant rejection of similar demands made by President Bush, Israeli troops have invaded Palestine a third time with tanks and troops shooting their way into the West Bank town of Qalqiliya.

President Bush demanded on April 4th and repeatedly since then that Israel leave the Palestinian cities, and he said Friday he'd had enough of the Israeli incursions.

President Bush said: "The Israelis understand my position.... There has been some progress, but it's now time to quit it altogether," Yet, giving a mixed message on the Middle East President Bush said to Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia: "We will not allow Israel to be crushed."

Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer said his forces would act on any new information about the whereabouts of suspected militants, inferring that Israel would do as she pleases regardless of Bush's statements and continue to assassinate suspected Palestinian militants.

"The Israeli military works on the basis of intelligence," Ben-Eliezer said during a meeting with troops in the West Bank. "The moment there are intelligence reports of gangs, individuals and suicide bombers, we have no other choice but to launch incursions to prevent these attacks."

Observing Bush telling the Israelis to quit seems somewhat like a man telling his attack dogs, "come here doggies, stop mauling that man", but taking no real action to stop the vicious dogs of war from tearing the victim apart. The neighbors of the victim see this lack of action and react with anger against the man and his dogs, only to be told that they will not be allowed to interfere with (muzzle) his dogs. What does President Bush mean by his statement: "We will not allow Israel to be crushed."? Does he think that muzzling the Israeli dogs of war equates to crushing Israel?

Not only is Bush and his advisors giving mixed signals and angering Arab nations over this Palestinian question, but he is also angering large numbers of Americans. Sharon's arrogant Zionist policies are causing Israel to take a severe public opinion hit not only in the United States but in the world. Hitler's arrogant Nazi policies caused Germany to take severe public opinion hits in the world as well leading up to their defeat and destruction as a nation. Being exposed to the American public view is the pro-Israel political force being held over the head of the government of the United States.

If Israel is going to be preserved, perhaps it is time for Bush to muzzle Sharon and call for a change in government in Israel. Such a move, regardless of whether that would anger some of the hidden advisors, would work ultimately to preserve Israel as a nation. Perhaps it is time to listen to former President Jimmy Carter and freeze the funding of over $10,000,000 per day of American tax payer money being given to Israel, at least until we get their attention to the world's demands against their military aggression.

Another thought that should be obvious when considering the naked aggression by the Israeli military against a nearly defenseless people is that they sure look and act like Nazis of the Third Reich in World War II. They attacked their neighbors viciously with troops regardless of world complaints and outcries against their aggression.. What was the ultimate outcome for the Third Reich? What might the outcome be for an arrogant Zionist Israel that basically tells the world to go to hell? Perhaps American Jewish families should play a part in reigning in the Zionist war machine. Their money and political clout counts not just to the government of the United States but to the government of Israel as well. The future of Israel may depend upon such restraint by American Jews.

Clearly, a Palestinian State must be created immediately by a coalition of the United States, Britain and other powers (perhaps including Russia) regardless of supposed prior conditions being demanded by the Zionists in Israel for the establishment of boundaries, etc. Boundaries were set in 1967.

Secondly, if the Israeli military does not get out immediately after this establishment of a Palestinian State, a Coalition military force must be used to expel them. The United Nations should then be asked to furnish an armed police force sufficient to repel further Israeli military incursions and a no fly zone must be established over Palestine against Israeli air power. Such a U.N. police force must also be sufficient to assist in stopping Islamic militants from crossing into Israel from Palestine to commit terrorist acts.

President Bush must be dreaming to suggest the use of unarmed peace keepers. Israeli tanks would ignore unarmed U.N. peacekeepers with impunity whenever Sharon wanted another "military excursion" into Palestine. The only way both states (Israel and Palestine) can have a chance to survive is for the security of both states to be forcible enhanced until they get off of their war footing and become organized and productive peaceful states.

Many Americans do not want to be pulled into another war because of the weakness and stupidity of the United States nor the arrogance of Israeli Zionists and Arab terrorists. Americans feel they have a right to freedom of the press and of speech and to criticize actions that are likely to adversely affect the lives of their families. We have the right to object to the much bigger war apparently being planned against the Arab world.

AFTER THOUGHTS ON THE ABOVE ARTICLE FOLLOWS

BUSH ADMINISTRATION MUST RETHINK THEIR FOREIGN POLICY

Federation of States - Wednesday, September 25, 2002 - We are now sorry we did not run the above article back in April of 2001. (Note: We wrote the article "Israeli Troops Unleash Third Nazi Style Invasion" April 26, 2001. We decided not to run it at that time. We finally did run it on September 25, 2002.) (See also "Israel Unleashes Nazi-Style Military Invasion" published April 8, 2001.) Clearly, now we see the disastrous results of both the Clinton and then Bush administration's foreign policy and their overwhelming and blind support for the Zionist government of Israel.

As we warned our fellow Confederate Americans and readers, we were on a collision course with the Islamic World. Sure enough, 9-11 happened! But, instead of causing the Bush administration to back away from their obviously pressured support for the Zionists in Israel, they have allowed more and more atrocities and assassinations to be openly committed by Israel against a virtually defenseless people, the Palestinians. The Palestinians have little else to fight with but their own lives, thus the suicide bombings against the Israeli attackers.

George Bush, to his credit, did call for the creation of a Palestinian State, but the heavy Zionist pressure from American Zionist businessmen and Senators have held sway to the point that Israel does as it pleases flouting strong requests of the United States and even of the United Nations. In other words, a foreign nation is controlling much our the foreign policy of the United States.

It has been a primary goal of Zionist Israel to eliminate Saddam Hussain's regime in Iraq even years before Desert Storm in the early 1990s. "It is the Oil, Stupid!" which is the title of an article written by Joseph Clifford where he outlines that the ultimate goal of big oil seems to be to gain direct or indirect control of the oil in the Middle East. Could this be the main reason why Israel wants to destroy the present government of Iraq? Could Israel want to control that oil? A little more territory (such as Iraq) would likely not be turned down by Israel either would it?

Israel has a first class military machine and air force although they are only a third class nation in over all military might, they do have substantial inventories of "weapons of mass destruction." Not only do they have chemical and biological capabilities, they are known to have perhaps as many as 100 nuclear warheads. They could threaten the world with these weapons whenever they should choose. But, to obtain real power and control over Europe, Israel needs the Middle East oil. Should the Pentagon look at Israel with a jaundice eye? They are no more a democracy under Sharon than was Nazi Germany in 1940 after the German people had upheld Adolf Hitler as Chancellor.

France, Germany, Russia, China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and a myriad of other nations have openly opposed the planned Bush War on Iraq who might, in the future have an atomic weapon and who might use it against someone. ??? Even British support seems somewhat questionable regardless of the assurances of Prime Minister Blair since British polls show the British people are against a preemptive military strike.

Unless Iraq does something overt to physically attack a Western nation, we should apply pressure on the Bush administration to back away from this insane military attack being planned and so heavily pushed by American Zionists. Iraq demands an end to U.N. import sanctions and an end to U.S. "No fly zones" over Iraq. Iraq has invited the U.N. inspectors back, but is unwilling to give up total sovereignty by allowing U.N. inspectors to change the rules and stiffen their inspection requirements. None of this justifies war. In the event that Iraq does more than rhetoric and actually attacks or attempts to attack a western nation, then war would be justified, but not by the United States unless President Bush gets Congress to Declare War Officially on Iraq which is a constitutional requirement for going to war against a nation.

Make no mistake about it, going in militarily to make a regime change in Iraq is not a slick way to avoid the constitutional requirement of the War Declaration Clause in the U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8 Such an action against Saddam Hussain to gain a regime change would be an act of war against a nation. If Iraq did physically attack the United States, and if President Bush honored his oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States and had Congress Declare War, then Confederate Americans should support that war whole heartedly. Confederate Americans are not bound by President Roosevelt's unconstitutional and illegally passed "War Powers Act of 1933" which essentially suspended the Constitution. Confederate Americans must insist that strict adherence to the Constitution is required of all bureaucrats including President Bush.

We should insist that the Bush administration bring real pressure, such as cutting off further financial aid to Israel if they do not stop their conquest and destruction of the Palestinian people and forthright move to help create the Palestinian State. That holds the real chance for peace and security in the region and such a strong stand by the United States forcing the hand of the egotistical warmongering rulers of Israel would go a long way in cooling off the danger of a world war between several Islamic nations and the United States and would help develop real peace and security for the people of Israel.

A war against Islam would not further any interests whatsoever of Confederate Americans or the South. Rather, such a war would fill corporate pockets while filling Southern graveyards and further the goals of those powerful forces to establish a New World Order with the United States as the leader which is so alien to the State's Rights position of our founding fathers.

Whether you are a Confederate American, a Democrat, a Republican or Libertarian it is imperative now that some of you wake up to what is going on in the name of the War on Terrorism. It really is the ticket to establish this New World Empire at the expense of our rights and sovereignty, North and South.