|
The Southern Independence Party of Texas
Confederate Views On Bush’s Phantom War On Terrorism
Federation of States, September 25, 2001 -
It has been 14 days since the United States was viciously attacked in
Manhattan (New York) and in Washington, D.C. There is mounting evidence
that not only were other attacks planned for September 11, 2001, but
that more attacks are certain and some of these apparently are aimed
at targets within the South, i.e. Florida and Texas.
We reported on September 11, 2001 in an article “Pearl Harbor Type Attack
on the United States” that due to the nature of the attack that Confederate
Patriots must defend the South, but that we also have an obligation to
assist the United States in this tragedy and in a response to it.
We stated in part:
Rather, we must, for the sake of our families, relatives and friends in the North as well as the
South, support the President of the United States and, if the United States goes to war, we
must support that effort.
This does not mean that we are abandoning our legitimate claims and goals for independence
for the South, the protection of our heritage and the restoration of the Confederate States of
America. But, even if we were already an independent nation with our own CSA
government, we would need to be very supportive of the United States in this time of
horror and tragedy. The reality is that we are [presently still] under the governance of the
United States and thus our lives and welfare are tied together.
|
However, since it will be mostly Southern fighting men called upon to conduct whatever type of
warfare that may unfold, we certainly do have the right to have our say in the matter. If the CSA
were an independent government today, we, of course, would have the right to establish our own
international contacts and opinions and to offer what ever degree of assistance and cooperation we
might deem correct for the Confederate States of America in support of the United States against
such attacks. However, we would not be so interested in this world-wide coalition of the Bush
administration and we certainly would not care to participate in any United Nations action.
Certainly, if the CSA had been attacked (under the example that were the CSA presently a functioning
and independent government), from the evidence now collected we would launch a massive air attack
on the Taliban Government without further hesitation nor without regard for possible defection of
Iran or Pakistan. Covert operations are fine and commando teams might well be working to capture
or kill Osama bin Laden and his key officers in the Taliban. But, that cannot take the place of overt
action.
The air attacks by this hypothetical CSA government would be two fold. First, we would launch
immediate tactical air attacks against the Taliban troops fighting the advancing Northern Alliance.
Secondly, both tactical and strategic bombing would have been launched against Taliban training
camps and convoys. Third, we would have dropped needed supplies to the Northern Alliance and
perhaps provided commando teams to work with them. We would, however, have hesitated to strike
at cities and towns against civilian populations. Finally, we would have considered dropping food
and medical supplies to some of the fleeing refuges. We would not need to be waiting until all the
countries of the world were united to make this retaliation against the Taliban regime and, in fact, we
would likely have declared war formally against them. Afterwards, then, we would seek out the al
Qaeda terrorist links around the world and begin the process of attempting to shut off their money
supply after destroying the Taliban government's opium economy.
Having given the above example of a likely Confederate response to such attacks upon the South, the
Federation of States and the Southern Independence Party now criticizes the Bush administration for
the excessive slowness of positioning and striking the rouge nation of Taliban Afghanistan. The Bush
administration is converting what should have been a war on the rouge Taliban opium nation into an
open ended "phantom war against terrorism" milking the terrorist strikes to the extreme for political
purposes and for the purpose of furthering the NEW WORLD ORDER.
Too much weakness is now being shown in attempting to walk a careful line to prevent further
antagonizing Moslems in other nations who have already been antagonized by the consistent
American actions in strongly supporting Israel in spite of the Israel State's brutal and terrorist attacks
against Palestinian citizens. The Bush administration is now showing weakness to the world whereas
two weeks ago it was showing strength and resolve. The American public wants to strike back and
they know who it is that should be struck. It is fine to pursue tactics to "smoke the terrorists out of
their caves", but the time has come for real military overt action. After that, these other tactics
being asked of foreign nations will be more credible.
The Bush administration is now changing the term "War on Terrorism [against phantoms]" to
"Operation Enduring Peace" Do you know the communist definition of "Peace"? To them it means
complete security by domination of police state force. The Bush administration is changing what
should have been a direct and rapid military response followed by the smoking out campaign into a
world wide open ended police action. This operation is being converted for use in consolidating the
global New World Order and to tighten the U.S. Federal police-state grip upon the lives and freedoms
of the American people.
The creation of the new National Homeland Security Agency (NHSA) which sounded good and
seemed needed under the apparent continuing terrorist threat, now appears to be the creation of
another agency to take military control of the United States by coordinating some 40 agencies defense
activities. The sinister threat presented by this new agency (NHSA) becomes clearer with the request
by Attorney General Ashcroft for vast new investigative wire tapping powers including seizing E-mail
and computers from alleged terrorists. During time of real war these things might be necessary. But,
his request has no time limit nor is it limited to known or proven (by reasonable evidence) terrorists
who may kill or have killed innocent people in the U.S.A., but instead, these new powers could also
be used against ordinary businessmen to develop evidence for indictment purposes for various white
collar allegations of offenses. (Economic Terrorists?) The IRS could have a hay day with these new
powers. Are we on a fast track into a police state for America in the name of "Operation Enduring
Peace"? Can we build more prisons to house more of our citizens? Is not a police state necessary
in order to implement the New World Order upon the American people?
Confederates take note. This is the reason we must now redouble our efforts to build the Southern
Federation of States into a political machine like the Southern Independence Party which could
restore our true freedoms through the restoration of the Confederate States of America as an
independent nation no longer occupied by the United States. This may be more difficult under the
current climate of a nation drunk on American Patriotism, but we must hold our own and continue
our goals. Let them in the U.S.A. have the United Nations and the New World Order if that is their
desire. We shall not join them in that even though we must, within reason, support the U.S.A. in its
military strikes against Afghanistan and in its efforts for Homeland Defense.
In regards to Homeland Defense, Confederates should favor emphasis on local area defense using
Sheriff Departments, National Guard and voluntary Civilian Defense Teams. Putting our defense in
the hands of a world wide coalition has all of the ear marks of a New World Order domination of our
local neighborhoods. We must press for local involvement, financing and control of our Homeland
defense with the help of our local Sheriff Departments.
Federation of States Staff
|